lupyuen/local-nuttx-update
1
0
Fork 0
forked from nuttx/nuttx-update
Code Pull requests Activity

update

Browse source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@1296 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
This commit is contained in:
patacongo 2008-11-20 21:59:36 +00:00
parent 9fe041fff5
commit c5a9c36751
1 changed files with 7 additions and 12 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

19
TODO
View file

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
NuttX TODO List (Last updated November 19, 2008)
NuttX TODO List (Last updated November 20, 2008)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(7) Task/Scheduler (sched/)
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ NuttX TODO List (Last updated November 19, 2008)
(1) Signals (sched/, arch/)
(1) pthreads (sched/)
(1) C++ Support
(15) Network (net/, netutils/)
(12) Network (net/, netutils/)
(1) USB (drivers/usbdev)
(4) Libraries (lib/)
(6) File system/Generic drivers (fs/, drivers/)
@ -190,22 +190,17 @@ o Network (net/, netutils/)
Priority: Low
Description: At present, there cannot be two concurrent active TCP send
operations in progress. This is because the uIP ACK logic will
support only one transfer at a time. The solution is simple:
A mutex will be needed to make sure that each send that is
started is able to be the exclusive sender until all of the
data to be sent has been ACKed.
operations in progress using the same socket. This is because
the uIP ACK logic will support only one transfer at a time. The
solution is simple: A mutex will be needed to make sure that each
send that is started is able to be the exclusive sender until all of
the data to be sent has been ACKed.
Status: Open. There is some temporary logic to examples/nsh that does
this same fix and that temporary logic should be removed when
send() is fixed.
Priority: Medium-Low. This is an important issue for applications that
send on the same TCP socket from multiple threads.
Description: Some application-level interface to the ICMP logic is needed
to support ping from the target.
Status: Open
Priority: Low
Description: TCP supports read-ahead buffering to handle the receipt of
TCP/IP packets when there is no read() in place. Should such
capability be useful for UDP? PRO: Would reduce packet loss