The default bpp is STM32_LTDC_L1_L8, when TM32_FB_CMAP=y,and The default bpp is STM32_LTDC_L1_RGB565 when TM32_FB_CMAP=n. The color-format bpp of stm32f429i is 16, so we should be disable TM32_FB_CMAP, otherwise fb demo will result in an error.
Signed-off-by: jianglianfang <jianglianfang@xiaomi.com>
This PR changes the Labeling of PRs so that the Architecture (arm, risc-v, xtensa, ...) is specified in the Board Label. Previously the CI Workflow would set Generic Board Labels like "Area: Board support". Now it will set the Arch-Specific Board Label like "Board: arm".
The Board Label will be used by the upcoming CI Build Rules to skip unnecessary builds. So "Board: arm" will enable only the builds for `arm-01` to `arm-14`. This is explained here: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/13775
Remove old directory so that "mv" can succeed instead of triggering "Directory not empty" error.
Signed-off-by: Yinzhe Wu <Yinzhe.Wu@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacky Cao <Jacky.Cao@sony.com>
Tested-by: Yinzhe Wu <Yinzhe.Wu@sony.com>
Refer to
https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/Overview.html
w/o compression, nxgcore command took 41seconds.
w compression, 28second.
If we enable `set trust-readonly-sections on` to read from elf whenever
possible, it furture reduces to 14.9seconds.
Signed-off-by: xuxingliang <xuxingliang@xiaomi.com>
Some app with same code runs on different cores in AMP mode,
need known physical core id on which the function is called.
Signed-off-by: fangxinyong <fangxinyong@xiaomi.com>
Check g_altpath. If only the CURRENT path is included,
the obj target use its own full path, otherwise just use the filename.
add default value current path for obj-path.
Signed-off-by: xuxin19 <xuxin19@xiaomi.com>
patches ending with cmake should be checked.
Currently, any non-cmake files containing cmake keywords will be checked.
Signed-off-by: xuxin19 <xuxin19@xiaomi.com>
In ./fs/inode directory, the variable name FAR struct inode *node is named inconsistently, with some using node and others using inode. To facilitate understanding, we will standardize the naming to FAR struct inode *inode.
Signed-off-by: cuiziwei <cuiziwei@xiaomi.com>
CI Build Job `arm-05` (runtime 2 hours) has become the Performance Bottleneck for CI Workflow. That's because `arm-05` builds too many targets for nRF, RP2040, SAM 3, SAM A and SAM D. This PR splits `arm-05` into multiple smaller jobs, to reduce the CI Build Duration.
Before the PR: `arm-05` is overloaded, build requires 2 hours
- `arm-05` (2 hours): nRF, RP2040, SAM 3, SAM A, SAM D
- `arm-06` (56 mins): STM32 [a-m]*
After the PR: `arm-05` is offloaded (to `arm-06` and `arm-07`), completes within 1 hour
- `arm-05` (47 mins): nRF
- `arm-06` (1 hour): Reserve for RP2040 exclusively
- `arm-07` (1 hour 15 mins): SAM 3, SAM A, SAM D, STM32 [a-m]*
Build Jobs are sorted by Target Name. So we cascade the changes and rename the Build Jobs: `arm-07` becomes `arm-08`, `arm-08` becomes `arm-09` etc. Then `arm-13` becomes a new job `arm-14`. (Which we added to `build.yml`)
Performance of `arm-05` is discussed in https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/13775 and https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/12773
