This commit cleans up redundant header file includes throughout the codebase.
The changes include:
- Removing duplicate #include directives that were present in the same file
- Consolidating includes that were split across multiple lines unnecessarily
- Removing unused includes that were no longer needed
- Fixing some formatting issues with includes
The changes improve code organization and maintainability by:
- Reducing unnecessary dependencies
- Making include dependencies more explicit
- Following consistent include patterns
- Removing dead code
No functional changes are made - this is purely a code cleanup commit.
Signed-off-by: Huang Qi <huangqi3@xiaomi.com>
If CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INITIALIZE is not selected, the userleds will
not be initialized. The userled initialization is not required to
be done within board_late_initialize(), thus this commit enables
initializing it in board_app_initialize() too.
CONFIG_DEV_ZERO is no longer needed in some defconfig files due to
- https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15223
This PR removes CONFIG_DEV_ZERO from the affected defconfig files:
```bash
make distclean ; tools/refresh.sh --silent canmv230:knsh
make distclean ; tools/refresh.sh --silent canmv230:master
make distclean ; tools/refresh.sh --silent canmv230:nsbi
...
```
The failed builds above were extracted from [nuttx-prometheus-to-mastodon.json](https://lupyuen.org/articles/mastodon.html#appendix-post-nuttx-builds-to-mastodon)
`CONFIG_TESTING_SCANFTEST` is no longer needed in `rv-virt:citest` defconfig because of https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2914
This PR excludes `CONFIG_TESTING_SCANFTEST` from `rv-virt:citest` so that CI Job `risc-v-05` will complete successfully.
After https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15075, the size of the
stack size has decreased 8 bytes and the init stack size for the
rv-virt:citest defconfig was near its full capacity, which lead to
crashing the `ps` command. The init stack size for this defconfig
was increased from 2048 to 3072 to avoid stack overflow.
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
`up_perf_init` defined in `nuttx/arch.h`, if CONFIG_ARCH_PERF_EVENTS enabled the compiler will raise a error:
```
board/esp32c3_boot.c:55:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'up_perf_init' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
55 | up_perf_init(NULL);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
board/esp32c3_boot.c:55:16: error: 'NULL' undeclared (first use in this function)
55 | up_perf_init(NULL);
| ^~~~
board/esp32c3_boot.c:28:1: note: 'NULL' is defined in header '<stddef.h>'; this is probably fixable by adding '#include <stddef.h>'
27 | #include <nuttx/board.h>
+++ |+#include <stddef.h>
28 |
board/esp32c3_boot.c:55:16: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
55 | up_perf_init(NULL);
| ^~~~
make[1]: *** [/home/huang/Work/nx/nuttx/boards/Board.mk:83: esp32c3_boot.o] Error 1
```
`riscv_internal.h` is a private chip level header file,
and it should not be included in the board files.
Signed-off-by: Huang Qi <huangqi3@xiaomi.com>
